Personal Jurisdiction (State Court) - Explained
How a State Court Establishes Personal Jurisdiction
If you still have questions or prefer to get help directly from an agent, please submit a request.
We’ll get back to you as soon as possible.
- Marketing, Advertising, Sales & PR
- Accounting, Taxation, and Reporting
- Professionalism & Career Development
Law, Transactions, & Risk Management
Government, Legal System, Administrative Law, & Constitutional Law Legal Disputes - Civil & Criminal Law Agency Law HR, Employment, Labor, & Discrimination Business Entities, Corporate Governance & Ownership Business Transactions, Antitrust, & Securities Law Real Estate, Personal, & Intellectual Property Commercial Law: Contract, Payments, Security Interests, & Bankruptcy Consumer Protection Insurance & Risk Management Immigration Law Environmental Protection Law Inheritance, Estates, and Trusts
- Business Management & Operations
- Economics, Finance, & Analytics
What is Personal Jurisdiction in a State Court?
Personal jurisdiction means that a court has the legal authority to exercise its authority over a person or individual.
This involves Service of Process.
Next Article: State Long-Arm Statute Back to: US COURT SYSTEM
What is Service of Process?
Service of process means providing an individual with a summons (or other authorized methods of notification), which gives notice to the individual that she is being called before the court.
How does a State Court Achieve personal Jurisdiction over an Individual?
Personal jurisdiction is obtained through Service of Process.
Personal jurisdiction in state court is governed by the individual state's law concerning service of process.
Service of process must generally take place (the summons must be delivered) while the defendant is physically present within that state.
The exception to this rule is that every state has a law, known as a long-arm statute, allowing service of process on defendants outside of the state.
- Relevant Law: As an example, see New York's Long-arm Statute, NY CPLR 302 (2012).
- Note: There are limited circumstances where a state will allow a court to exercise jurisdiction over an individual without delivering a summons. For example, a court may exercise jurisdiction over an individual in a family matter (such a divorce), if that individual is a resident of the state and cannot be found after diligent search. Another situation is that a court may exercise jurisdiction over an individual's real estate that is located in the state without delivering a summons to that individual if all attempts to locate the individual fail and notice is posted on the property.
Why do you think that states place such importance on delivering notice to establish personal jurisdiction? Do you feel like serving an individual with a summons while she is within the state justifies the court in exercising jurisdiction over that person? Do you think it is justifiable in any circumstance to exercise jurisdiction over someone without delivering a summons?
- Effectuating service of process (delivering the summons) implicates and individuals due process rights, under the 14th Amendment of the US Constitution. As such, states are cautious not to infringe upon a defendant's rights. Some would argue that mere presence in the state should not be an adequate basis for jurisdiction. The reasoning is that the presence in the state could be fleeting with little additional ties to the state. Others might argue that this is the most appropriate method of establishing personal jurisdiction, as physical presence in the state demonstrates the requisite level of connection to the forum.
Quinton decides to sue Maria for backing into his new car in the parking lot of the grocery store. Quinton files a lawsuit and pays a process server to deliver the summons and complaint to Maria. The process server tries for weeks to locate Maria but is unsuccessful. Will Quinton be able to sue Maria if he cannot deliver the summons and complaint?
- The inability to find the defendant presents a problem for delivering the summons and perfecting service of process. Most states, however, have alternative methods of delivering a summons in specific circumstances. For example, all states allow for service of process on the driver of a vehicle by sending the summons through the Department of Motor Vehicles. For example, see California's law concerning service of process through the state DMV.
- US Courts (Intro)
- What is the Authority for Article III Courts?
- What is the Authority for Article I Courts?
- What is the authority for courts under Article II?
- What is the authority for Article IV Territorial Courts?
- What is the authority for State Courts?
- What are Article III Courts?
- What are Article I Administrative Courts?
- What are Article IV Territorial Courts?
- What are state courts?
- What is Subject-Matter Jurisdiction?
- What is Federal Court Subject-Matter Jurisdiction?
- What is State Court Subject-Matter Jurisdiction?
- Can a Federal trial courts hear state matters & vice versa?
- Can a Federal appellate court hear federal matters & vice versa?
- What is Personal Jurisdiction?
- How to establish Federal Court Personal Jurisdiction?
- How to establish State Court Personal Jurisdiction?
- What is a Long-Arm Statute?
- Who are the primary players in the state judicial system?
- What types of judges are part of the judiciary?
- What is the role of jurors in the judicial system?
- What number of jurors and juror votes are required for guilt or liability?
- What do Attorneys do?
- Who are the other players in the judicial system?
- US Circuit Court?
- US Supreme Court?
- Appeals from Legislative and Administrative Courts
- Appeals in the state court system?