Jury Votes Required for Finding Guilt or Liability
How Many is Enough?
If you still have questions or prefer to get help directly from an agent, please submit a request.
We’ll get back to you as soon as possible.
- Accounting, Taxation, and Reporting
Law, Transactions, & Risk Management
Government, Legal System, Administrative Law, & Constitutional Law Legal Disputes - Civil & Criminal Law Agency Law HR, Employment, Labor, & Discrimination Business Entities, Corporate Governance & Ownership Business Transactions, Antitrust, & Securities Law Real Estate, Personal, & Intellectual Property Commercial Law: Contract, Payments, Security Interests, & Bankruptcy Consumer Protection Insurance & Risk Management Immigration Law Environmental Protection Law Inheritance, Estates, and Trusts
- Marketing, Advertising, Sales & PR
- Business Management & Operations
- Economics, Finance, & Analytics
- Professionalism & Career Development
What are the Rules for the Number of Jurors and Votes?
The number of jurors and the number of juror votes required for a finding of guilt or civil liability vary depending upon the type of case (criminal or civil) and the court (state or federal).
Next Article: What do Attorneys Do? Back to: US COURT SYSTEM
How many jurors are required in a criminal trial?
The exact number varies under state and federal law.
Generally, a criminal trial requires a minimum of 5 or 6 jurors.
In most cases where capital punishment is a possibility, a statute will require a minimum of 12 jurors.
How many jurors are required in a civil trial?
Not all civil court cases involve a jury trial.
Rule 48 of FRCP states that, "a Court shall seat a jury of not fewer than six and not more than twelve members."
Most cases do not have 12 jurors.
How many jurors must vote for conviction in a criminal trial?
In criminal cases, most courts (state and federal) require a unanimous vote by the jury to find the defendant guilty.
Currently, courts in only two states allow for conviction of a defendant via non-unanimous voting, and those are generally reserved for minor charges.
- Note: Federal military courts-martial, a special form of Article I federal court that enforces criminal actions, allows for a non-unanimous finding of guilty in certain cases.
How many jurors must vote for liability in a criminal trial?
In civil cases, many states have eliminated the unanimity requirement to find a defendant liable.
This means that many states allow for a finding of civil liability with a simple majority vote by jurors.
These statutes may require a minimum number of jurors on the jury.
Are jurors required to disclose their votes or reasoning?
In general, juries do not need to give reasons for their votes in a civil or criminal case.
The jury will provide a simple verdict (guilty/not guilty or liable/not liable) and does not have to explain its reasoning in the matter.
Some special verdicts, however, require jurors to answer a series of questions to ascertain their understanding of the law and procedure.
Further, the jury may have to indicate whether they find aggravating circumstances, which may be a legal requirement for a certain finding.
Even in these cases, the juror does not have to explain why they find facts to be convincing or no.
As previously stated, the specific rules applicable to jurors, juror votes, and findings will vary slightly depending upon the case and the court system.
Discussion: How do you feel about the requirement in civil cases that a majority of jurors find liability? Are there good arguments for or against requiring unanimous jury findings in civil trials? What do you think about only requiring six jurors when determining guilt or innocence in a criminal trial (other than capital trials)? Should jurors be required to give their reasoning behind finding guilt or innocence?
- Many would argue that allowing for a finding of liability in civil trial by a simple majority of jurors is unfair. They would argue that the standard should be unanimous, as in criminal trials. A civil judgment can be detrimental to a person's existence. There is a valid argument that such a decision should not be predicated on a majority, rather than unanimous, jury finding.
Practice Question: Julie is a law clerk for a mid-sized legal firm. She is assigned to assist firm attorneys on a civil litigation matter in which her firm is defending its client in a contract dispute for $2 million. The client is a large corporation with a corporate counsel who wants to be apprised of every step of the litigation. Her first assignment is to work on the voir dire questions used to identify biases in potential juror candidates. As part of the assignment, she is putting together a one-page explanation of the jury selection process for the client. She begins by laying out the total number of jurors required, votes required to establish liability, and any additional requirements of the jury. Help Julie write this first portion of the strategic plan.
- Since this is a civil case, the number of jurors required will be between 6-12. For the purpose of this case, Julie should consider having 7 jurors. Having few jurors to convince is could be a good tactic; but having an odd number is best. She should then try to identify as much information about the juror's backgrounds, political preferences, opinions about companies like her client, etc. Particularly, she will want to zero in on any identifiable juror biases. This will help in determining which jurors to strike during the voir dire process. Finally, she should come up with a plan for ranking jurors based upon their characteristics. This will allow her to effectively employ her peremptory challenges.
Academic Research on Juries
- Fukurai, Hiroshi, The Representative Jury Requirement: Jury Representativeness and Cross-Sectional Participation from the Beginning to the End of the Jury Selection Process (March 23, 1999). International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice, Spring 1999, 23: 55-90. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2584198
- Gordon, Sara, All Together Now: Using Principles of Group Dynamics to Train Better Jurors (2015). Indiana Law Review, Vol. 48, No. 2, p. 415, 2015; UNLV William S. Boyd School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper Series. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2479572 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2479572
- Fukurai, Hiroshi, Race, Social Class, Jury Participation: New Dimensions for Evaluating Discrimination in Jury Service and Jury Selection (March 23, 1996). Journal of Criminal Justice, 1996, 24:71-88. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2584208
- Howe, Scott, Juror Neutrality or an Impartiality Array? A Structural Theory of the Impartial Jury Mandate. Notre Dame Law Review, Vol. 70, No. 5, 1995. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1009325
- Tiersma, Peter M., Asking Jurors to Do the Impossible (March 2, 2009). Loyola-LA Legal Studies Paper No. 2009-12. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1352093 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1352093