Appeal to US Federal Circuit Court - Explained
What Does the Circuit Court of Appeals Do?
If you still have questions or prefer to get help directly from an agent, please submit a request.
We’ll get back to you as soon as possible.
- Marketing, Advertising, Sales & PR
- Accounting, Taxation, and Reporting
- Professionalism & Career Development
Law, Transactions, & Risk Management
Government, Legal System, Administrative Law, & Constitutional Law Legal Disputes - Civil & Criminal Law Agency Law HR, Employment, Labor, & Discrimination Business Entities, Corporate Governance & Ownership Business Transactions, Antitrust, & Securities Law Real Estate, Personal, & Intellectual Property Commercial Law: Contract, Payments, Security Interests, & Bankruptcy Consumer Protection Insurance & Risk Management Immigration Law Environmental Protection Law Inheritance, Estates, and Trusts
- Business Management & Operations
- Economics, Finance, & Analytics
Table of ContentsWhat is an Appeal to the US Circuit Courts of Appeals?How do cases arrive before the Federal Courts of Appeal?Discussion QuestionPractice QuestionAcademic Research
What is an Appeal to the US Circuit Courts of Appeals?
The US Courts of Appeals hears cases appealed from the Federal District Courts. Like all appellate courts, the Courts of Appeal review cases to determine:
- whether the correct law was applied, and
- whether it was applied correctly, and
- whether the law, as applied, violates rights provided by the US Constitution.
Next Article: Appeal to US Supreme Court Back to: US COURT SYSTEM
How do cases arrive before the Federal Courts of Appeal?
Generally, appeals derive from a request by the losing party at trial. In some cases, however, a party may make an interlocutory appeal, which is an appeal of a single issue before the case has been decided.
This is only allowed, however, when the issue is extremely important or would effectively decide the case.
The losing party generally requests permission to file an appeal with the Court of Appeals.
The court will either grant the request or deny it making final the decision on the appealed issue.
- Relevant Law: Rule 18 of the Supreme Court Rules, provides the procedure for appeal from a district court ruling. 28 USC 2107 outlines the time period for appeal.
Do you think that interlocutory appeals should be allowed? What are some good arguments for allowing such appeals? Arguments against them?
- A primary reason for allowing an interlocutory appeal is when the issue being appealed would determine the outcome of the case. If the matter would not be outcome determinative, there is an argument that allowing such appeals is nothing more than a delay tactic that hinders the ability of the judiciary to successfully process cases.
ABC, Inc., is facing a civil lawsuit in federal district court initiated by one of its employees for allegedly failing to provide the required disclosures about the company-sponsored retirement plans. The applicable federal law lays out numerous standards for plan disclosure and provides that a company that fails to comply will be subject to actual and statutory damages. ABC believes that the law is ambiguous and does not require the disclosures identified by the plaintiff. During trial, ABC moves for the court for a directed verdict in its favor. The court denies the motion. ABC knows that continuing to a jury trial will cost lots of money and that a jury is always likely to find in favor of an employee over an employer. Nonetheless, ABC does not want to settle the case and leave open the question of whether it must comply with this level of disclosure. What are ABCs options regarding appealing any outcome from the trial court? [ht_toggle title="Proposed Answer" id="" class="" ]
- ABC may make an interlocutory appeal. If granted, the appellate court may determine that such a requirement is outside of the intent of the relevant statute. If so, this would be determinative of the outcome of the case.
Lammon, Bryan, Finality, Appealability, and the Scope of Interlocutory Review (March 13, 2018). 93 Washington Law Review 1809 (2018). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3139926 [/ht_toggle]