Securities Law - Investment Contract
Using the Howey Test
If you still have questions or prefer to get help directly from an agent, please submit a request.
We’ll get back to you as soon as possible.
- Marketing, Advertising, Sales & PR
- Accounting, Taxation, and Reporting
- Professionalism & Career Development
Law, Transactions, & Risk Management
Government, Legal System, Administrative Law, & Constitutional Law Legal Disputes - Civil & Criminal Law Agency Law HR, Employment, Labor, & Discrimination Business Entities, Corporate Governance & Ownership Business Transactions, Antitrust, & Securities Law Real Estate, Personal, & Intellectual Property Commercial Law: Contract, Payments, Security Interests, & Bankruptcy Consumer Protection Insurance & Risk Management Immigration Law Environmental Protection Law Inheritance, Estates, and Trusts
- Business Management & Operations
- Economics, Finance, & Analytics
Table of ContentsWhat is an Investment Contract?What qualifies as an investment contract?Discussion QuestionPractice QuestionAcademic Research
What is an Investment Contract?
An investment contract is a broad category of security under The Securities Act of 1933. The text for determine what is an investment contract is examined below.
Next Article: Major Federal Securities Laws Back to: SECURITIES LAW
What qualifies as an investment contract?
The broadest category of a business interest constituting a security is an investment contract. Courts have developed a number of tests to determine what constitutes an investment contract. The most influential is the Howey test. The elements for determining whether a business interest constitutes an investment contract (and thereby a security) are as follows:
- an investment of money,
Note: To invest money means to provide any sort of value to the company in exchange for a beneficial interest in or ownership of the company. The investment does not have to be cash or currency.
Example: I receive an ownership interest (10% ownership) in your business activity in exchange for my contribution of a pickup truck for use in the business.
- in a common enterprise,
Note: A common enterprise is any form of concerted business activity. The enterprise does not have to be a registered business entity.
Example: A common enterprise may include a default entity form, such as a general partnership.
- with the expectation of profits, and
Note: The expectation of profits is a very broad notion. An individual can invest in the enterprise with the purpose of directly or indirectly deriving profits. This may include the objective of taking advantage of any tax benefits associated with the investment.
Example: I invest in ABC, LLC. The LLC will have losses this year and for the next couple of years. I am not actively involved in the business. As such, I will be able to offset the passive losses against the active profits I have in a separate investment. This will reduce my tax liability. Eventually, I expect ABC, LLC to produce a profit.
- derived solely from the efforts of others.
Note: Derived solely from the efforts of others means that the investor does not actively take part in the business activity. She may be able to offer limited guidance to the business managers, but she does not take part in the active affairs of the business. This provision seems to eliminate investments in games of chance that do not involve a business activity or a concerted activity with someone else.
Example: I am interested in providing money to Alice's design services business. I may offer some guidance to Alice in how to run the business, but I do not take part in any of Alices business operations. It is Alice's efforts and not my personal activity that constitute the business (such as in a sole proprietorship or general partnership). Each element of this test requires considerable analysis. Courts have interpreted each element to add a great deal of specificity and complexity to the individual factors.
Why do you think the definition of an investment contract has been interpreted so broadly? What would be the potential effect of a narrow interpretation?
Ralph is an avid gambler. He loves to wager money on any type of sporting event or game of chance. He puts his money in a pool to purchase lottery tickets under the understanding that everyone will split any winnings. Is this an investment contract? Why or why not? Does it change your analysis if Ralph and the other investors depend upon Carter to manage the funds, purchase and hold the tickets, collect any winnings, and distribute those funds to any investors? Why?