Trickle-down Theory - Explained
What is the Trickle-Down Theory?
- Marketing, Advertising, Sales & PR
- Accounting, Taxation, and Reporting
- Professionalism & Career Development
-
Law, Transactions, & Risk Management
Government, Legal System, Administrative Law, & Constitutional Law Legal Disputes - Civil & Criminal Law Agency Law HR, Employment, Labor, & Discrimination Business Entities, Corporate Governance & Ownership Business Transactions, Antitrust, & Securities Law Real Estate, Personal, & Intellectual Property Commercial Law: Contract, Payments, Security Interests, & Bankruptcy Consumer Protection Insurance & Risk Management Immigration Law Environmental Protection Law Inheritance, Estates, and Trusts
- Business Management & Operations
- Economics, Finance, & Analytics
What is the Trickle-Down Theory?
The trickle-down theory (otherwise known as trickle-down economics) postulates that applying special tax cuts to the rich and wealthy as well as bigger corporations with benefit the society, by later affecting everyone else. This model states that the application of income and capital tax cuts or the addition of other financial benefits to big corporations and large investors will alter the economic growth of a nation positively. It focuses on the belief that economic growth is most likely propelled by entities with the biggest resources and skills, and in a case where this growth this achieved, the community benefits at large.
How does the Trickle-Down Theory Work?
The trickle-down theory is not really an economic assumption but a political concept. While most persons will confuse it with supply-side economics, there is really no concept there that fits economic values. An example of the trickle-down theory is the US bank bailouts in 2008, as well as the European Unions Common Agricultural Policy (CAP). For a policy to be termed trickle-down, it must satisfy the following:
- It benefits only wealthy individuals and corporations in the short-run
- It is deemed to benefit the general public in the long run
During the Great Depression, American Comedian and Commentator made reference to the trickle-down economic when he used it to describe the then-President Herbert Hoovers stimulus efforts. In modern days, this term is used to attack President Ronald Reagans income tax cut.
Relationship between the Laffer Curve and Trickle-Down
During the Ronald Reagan administration, advisor Arthur Laffer proposed a bell-curve style pattern analysis for drafting the relationship between the alterations in the government tax rate and the nominal tax receipts. This analysis was rather termed the Laffer Curve. The shape of the curve proposes that there is a chance that taxes might not produce maximum revenue or receipts to the government. An example would be a light tax of 0% and a heavy tax of 100%. Both of them wont benefit the economy, because at 0%, taxes will not be incurred in the nation, and at 100% businesses wont operate because there is no chance of making a profit (which is the sole aim of business establishments). Thus, this model suggests that tax cuts would help increase receipts since it encourages more taxable income. This idea from Arthur Laffer was termed trickle-down as it suggested that tax cuts will boost economic growth and returns from tax. The US marginal tax rate fell from 70 to 20 between 1980 to 1988, and total receipts moved up to $991 billion from $599 billion between 1981 to 1989 when this theory was applied. This strengthened the Laffer Curve as expected, although the theory doesnt prove any relationship between tax cuts and its benefit to average and low-income employees.
Types of Trickle-Down and their Shortcomings
Trickle-down economics is displayed in two forms: supply-side and demand-side. In the former, the theory states that tax cuts for wealthy individuals and corporations would lead to more jobs and a better standard of living as these entities hold the resources required for an increase in economic growth. The demand-side, on the other hand, propose that these wealth entities need protection to continue paying employees and to increase spending. The supply side is mainly associated with tax cuts, while the demand-side is mostly associated with tariffs and subsidies. Both sides are keen on transferring wealth to those who are already wealthy, and this alters the normal economic structure of wealth acquisition and free-market which suggests that wealth is gained after providing services and not before providing services.
Modern Day Trickle-Down Theory
The trickle-down theory has become a ground for many Republican policies. In 2017, President Donald Trump suggested cutting down corporate taxes to 20%, in order to benefit wealthy entities. His plan was to reduce both corporate and income tax rates, double deduction standards and reduce personal exemption, which refers to a sum which can be deducted for an individual and their beneficiaries before a tax is filed. Criticisms occurred on both sides of the intended policies. Some of them claimed that the top 1% would benefit much more than those in the low-income earners circle. Others, however, claimed that the economic growth from the intended policy would not alter loss of revenue from tax cuts.
Related Topics
- What is Government Spending?
- Autonomous Spending
- Autonomous Consumption
- Fiscal Policy
- Expansionary Fiscal Policy
- Contractionary Fiscal Policy
- Progressive vs Regressive Tax
- Marginal Tax Rates
- Proportional Tax
- Trickle Down Theory
- Discretionary Fiscal Policy
- Automatic Stabilizers
- Effects of Discretionary Policy (Interest Rates & Lags)
- Crowding Out Effect
- National Debt
- Government Borrowing
- Golden Rule
- Ricardian Equivalence
- Balanced Budget - Deficit and Surplus
- National Debt
- Standardized Employment Budget
- Deficit Hawk
- Austerity
- Twin Deficits
- Fiscal Policy and the Aggregate Supply and Demand Curve
- Stabilization Policy
- Robin Hood Effect
- Ricardo Barro Effect
- Automatic Stabilizers
- Standardized Employment Budget
- How Does Fiscal Policy Affect Interest Rates?
- Crowding Out
- Types of Lag in Fiscal Policy
- Temporary and Permanent Fiscal Policy
- Limitations of Fiscal Policy?
- How Politics Affects Discretionary Fiscal Policy
- Government Borrowing
- National Savings and Investment Identity
- Debtor Nation
- Fiscal Policy Affects Trade Balances
- Twin Deficits
- Exchange Rates Affect Budget and Trade Deficits
- What are the risks of chronic large deficits in the United States?
- How Fiscal Policy Can Affect Trade Imbalances
- Government Borrowing Affect Private Savings
- Ricardian Equivalence
- Fiscal Policy Affects Investment and Economic Growth
- Crowding Out of Physical Capital Investment?
- How Does Government Borrowing Affect Interest Rates in Financial Markets?
- Government Investment in Physical Capital
- Public Investment in Human Capital
- Fiscal Policy Can Affect Technology Development
- Economic Cycle or Business Cycle
- Business Cycle Indicator
- Peak and Trough
- Recession and Depression
- Hard Landing vs Soft Landing
- Economic Bubble
- Boom and Bust Cycle
- Great Depression
- Baby Boomer Age Wave Theory
- Skyscrapper Effect (Economics)
- V-Shaped Recovery
- W-Shaped Recovery
- U-Shaped Recovery
- Kondratieff Wave Cycle
- Contagion
- Feedback Rule Policy
- American Customer Satisfaction Index
- CNN Effect
- Bureau of Economic Analysis
- Business Starts Index
- American Recover and Reinvestment Act
- Abenomics
- Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008
- Commodity Credit Corporation
- Humphrey Hawkins Act
- Stagnation
- Neoclassical Growth Theory
- Exogenous Growth Theory
- Endogenous Growth Theory
- New Growth Theory - Explained
- Classical Growth Theory - Explained
- Real Economic Growth Rate - Explained
- Plutonomy