Full Faith and Credit Clause
States must respect the laws of other states.
If you still have questions or prefer to get help directly from an agent, please submit a request.
We’ll get back to you as soon as possible.
- Marketing, Advertising, Sales & PR
- Accounting, Taxation, and Reporting
- Professionalism & Career Development
Law, Transactions, & Risk Management
Government, Legal System, Administrative Law, & Constitutional Law Legal Disputes - Civil & Criminal Law Agency Law HR, Employment, Labor, & Discrimination Business Entities, Corporate Governance & Ownership Business Transactions, Antitrust, & Securities Law Real Estate, Personal, & Intellectual Property Commercial Law: Contract, Payments, Security Interests, & Bankruptcy Consumer Protection Insurance & Risk Management Immigration Law Environmental Protection Law Inheritance, Estates, and Trusts
- Business Management & Operations
- Economics, Finance, & Analytics
What is the Full Faith and Credit Clause?
Article IV, Section 1 of the US Constitution states, Full faith and credit shall be given in each state to the public Acts, Records, and judicial proceedings of every other state.
This is known as the Full Faith & Credit Clause.
Next Article: What is the Privileges & Immunities Clause? Back to: CONSTITUTIONAL LAW
What does the Full Faith and Credit Clause mean?
Restated, Article IV requires that each state recognize the laws of every other state. The only exception to these rule concerns laws that violate the public policy of another state. In such a case, a state may refuse to recognize the legality of the foreign law or legal agreement.
- Example: State A issues a warrant for the arrest of Jane Smith. If the arrest warrant is transferred to State B for execution, State B may not intentionally fail to recognize the validity of the State As warrant.
- Example: State A grants marriage licenses and performs marriages for same-sex couples. State B must recognize these marriages as valid. State B may attempt to argue that recognizing the marriages violates public policy. This argument, however, has generally been rejected by the US Supreme Court.
Discussion: Can you think of laws recognized in one state but not another based on public policy? Currently, there is a debate across states regarding each state's recognition of same-sex marriage. What are the implications of one state recognizing same-sex marriage and others not? [ht_toggle title="Discussion Input" id="" class="" ]
- Is it possible for one state to fail to recognize an adoption carried out in another state (which is approved through court judgment)? Generally, states must recognize same-sex marriages performed in other states. https://www.oyez.org/cases/2014/14-556. Failure of one state to recognize a same-sex couples marriage could forfeit rights with regard to taxation, property ownership, inheritance, insurance coverage, entitlement benefits, etc. There is generally little debate regarding one state's obligation to observe the judgments of another state, without an obvious public policy exemption. https://constitutioncenter.org/interactive-constitution/interpretations/full-faith-and-credit-some-lingering-dilemmas
Practice Question: John sues Donna in Maryland for losses suffered as a result of Donna's fraudulent business practices. The court rules in favor of John and issues judgment against Donna for $1 million. Instead of paying the judgment, Donna goes to California and resumes her business practices. If John attempts to collect the judgment against Donna, does California have any obligation regarding the recognition and enforcement of Maryland's civil judgment?
- Under the Full Faith and Credit Clause, Article IV, Section I, there is an obligation for one state to adhere to the laws of another state. John will likely have to register the judgment with the State of California and pursue enforcement through methods allowed under California state law
Academic Research on the Full Faith and Credit Clause
- Sachs, Stephen E., Full Faith and Credit in the Early Congress (September 2009). Virginia Law Review, Vol. 95, pp. 1201-1279, 2009. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1032676
- Borchers, Patrick Joseph, The Essential Irrelevance of the Full Faith and Credit Clause to the Same-Sex Marriage Debate. Creighton Law Review, Vol. 38, p. 353, 2005 . Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=899385
- Whitten, Ralph U., The Original Understanding of the Full Faith and Credit Clause and the Defense of Marriage Act (November 28, 2010). Creighton Law Review, p. 255, 1998. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1716566
- Sanders, Steve, Is the Full Faith and Credit Clause Still 'Irrelevant' to Same-Sex Marriage?: Toward a Reconsideration of the Conventional Wisdom (January 1, 2014). Indiana Law Journal, Vol. 89, No. 1, 2014; Indiana Legal Studies Research Paper No. 294. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2464585
- Clark, J. Stephen, Conflicts Originalism: The 'Original Content' of the Full Faith and Credit Clause and the Compulsory Choice of Marriage Law (December 1, 2015). West Virginia Law Review, Vol. 118, No. 2, 2015. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2984075
- Terry, Pamela, E Pluribus Unum? The Full Faith and Credit Clause and Meaningful Recognition of Out-of-State Adoptions (March 7, 2012). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2017812 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2017812
- Engdahl, David E., The Classic Rule of Faith and Credit. Seattle University School of Law Research Paper No. 09-10; Yale Law Journal, Vol. 118, p. 1584, 2009. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1308426
- Redpath, Elizabeth, Between Judgment and Law: Full Faith and Credit, Public Policy, and State Records (April 25, 2012). Emory Law Journal, Vol. 62, p. 639, 2013. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2046047
- Pollack, Sheldon D., Full Faith and Conflict of Law: The Peculiar Legacy of Legal Federalism (March 1, 2015). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2571934 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2571934