Trans-Pacific Strategic Partnership - Explained
What is the Trans-Pacific Partnership?
If you still have questions or prefer to get help directly from an agent, please submit a request.
We’ll get back to you as soon as possible.
- Marketing, Advertising, Sales & PR
- Accounting, Taxation, and Reporting
- Professionalism & Career Development
Law, Transactions, & Risk Management
Government, Legal System, Administrative Law, & Constitutional Law Legal Disputes - Civil & Criminal Law Agency Law HR, Employment, Labor, & Discrimination Business Entities, Corporate Governance & Ownership Business Transactions, Antitrust, & Securities Law Real Estate, Personal, & Intellectual Property Commercial Law: Contract, Payments, Security Interests, & Bankruptcy Consumer Protection Insurance & Risk Management Immigration Law Environmental Protection Law Inheritance, Estates, and Trusts
- Business Management & Operations
- Economics, Finance, & Analytics
Table of ContentsWhat is the Trans-Pacific Strategic Economic Partnership?Academic Research on Trans-Pacific Strategic Economic Partnership
What is the Trans-Pacific Strategic Economic Partnership?
The Trans-Pacific Strategic Economic Partnership Agreement (TPSEP) was signed in 2005. It refers to a free trade agreement that was signed by the governments of Brunei Darussalam, New Zealand, Singapore and Chile. These four countries are Pacific Rim countries (countries that border the Pacific Ocean). TPSEP came into force in 2006.
Back to: INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS, LAW, & RELATIONS
Academic Research on Trans-Pacific Strategic Economic Partnership
- The Trans-Pacific Partnership: New Paradigm of Wolf in Sheep's Clothing, Lewis, M. K. (2011). BC Int'l & Comp. L. Rev., 34, 27.
- American New Strategy of Asia-Pacific Regional Integration and China's Policy: An Insight of Development of Trans-Pacific Strategic Economic Partnership [J], Bin, S. (2010). Nankai Journal (Philosophy, Literature and Social Science Edition), 4, 014.
- The Trans-Pacific Partnership and Asia-Pacific Integration: Policy Implications, Petri, P. A., & Plummer, M. G. (2012).Multilateralising regionalism: what role for the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement?, Capling, A., & Ravenhill, J. (2011). The Pacific Review, 24(5), 553-575.
- The Trans-Pacific Partnership and China's Corresponding Strategies, Yuan, W. J. (2012). Center for Strategic & International Studies, 2.
- The Trans-Pacific Strategic Economic Partnership Agreement: High Standard or Missed Opportunity?, Gao, S. H. (2009).
- The Trans-Pacific Strategic Economic Partnership Agreement, Fergusson, I. F., & Vaughn, B. (2009, December). LIBRARY OF CONGRESS WASHINGTON DC CONGRESSIONAL RESEARCH SERVICE.
- Negotiations for the Trans-Pacific Partnership agreement: Evaluation and implications for East Asian regionalism, Cheong, I. (2013).
- America Should Support the Trans-Pacific Strategic Economic Partnership, Markheim, D. (2008). Web Memo, (2178).
- The Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement (TPP) Negotiations: Overview and Prospects, Elms, D., & Lim, C. L. (2012).
- Expanding the P-4 trade agreement into a broader trans-pacific partnership: implications, risks and opportunities, Lewis, M. K. (2009). Asian J. WTO & Int'l Health L & Pol'y, 4, 401.