Iceberg of Change Management - Explained
What is the Iceberg of Change Management?
Written by J. Mance Gordon
Updated at April 22nd, 2024
- Marketing, Advertising, Sales & PR
- Accounting, Taxation, and Reporting
- Professionalism & Career Development
-
Law, Transactions, & Risk Management
Government, Legal System, Administrative Law, & Constitutional Law Legal Disputes - Civil & Criminal Law Agency Law HR, Employment, Labor, & Discrimination Business Entities, Corporate Governance & Ownership Business Transactions, Antitrust, & Securities Law Real Estate, Personal, & Intellectual Property Commercial Law: Contract, Payments, Security Interests, & Bankruptcy Consumer Protection Insurance & Risk Management Immigration Law Environmental Protection Law Inheritance, Estates, and Trusts
- Business Management & Operations
- Economics, Finance, & Analytics
What is the Iceberg of Management Change?
The Change Management Iceberg, proposed by Wilfried Krüger, addresses organizational change by examining how managers deal with barriers.
According to Krüger, using an iceberg metaphor, explains that many change managers only consider the top of the iceberg: Cost, Quality and Time ("Issue Management").
However, below the surface of the water there are two more dimensions of Change and implementation Management:
- Management of Perceptions and Beliefs, and
- Power and Politics Management
Superficial Issue Management can only achieve results at a level consistent with the acceptance that is below the surface.
What kind of barriers arise, and what kind of Implementation Management is consequently needed, depends on:
1. the kind of Change
- hard things "only" (information systems, processes) just scratches the surface,
- soft things also (values, mindsets and capabilities) is much more profound
2. the applied Change strategy
- revolutionary, dramatic change
- evolutionary, incremental change
People involved in Organizational Change
- Opponents have both a negative general attitude towards change AND a negative behavior towards this particular personal change. They need to be controlled by Management of Perceptions and Beliefs to change their minds as far as possible.
- Promoters on the other hand have both a positive generic attitude towards change AND are positive about this particular change for them personally. They take advantage of the change and will therefore support it.
- Hidden Opponents have a negative generic attitude towards change although they seem to be supporting the change on a superficial level ("Opportunists"). Here Management of Perceptions and Beliefs supported by information (Issue management ) is needed to change their attitude.
- Potential Promoters have a generic positive attitude towards change, however for certain reasons they are not convinced (yet) about this particular change. Power and Politics management seems to be appropriate in this case.