Commercial Speech and the 1st Amendment - Explained
What is Commercial Speech?
If you still have questions or prefer to get help directly from an agent, please submit a request.
We’ll get back to you as soon as possible.
- Marketing, Advertising, Sales & PR
- Accounting, Taxation, and Reporting
- Professionalism & Career Development
Law, Transactions, & Risk Management
Government, Legal System, Administrative Law, & Constitutional Law Legal Disputes - Civil & Criminal Law Agency Law HR, Employment, Labor, & Discrimination Business Entities, Corporate Governance & Ownership Business Transactions, Antitrust, & Securities Law Real Estate, Personal, & Intellectual Property Commercial Law: Contract, Payments, Security Interests, & Bankruptcy Consumer Protection Insurance & Risk Management Immigration Law Environmental Protection Law Inheritance, Estates, and Trusts
- Business Management & Operations
- Economics, Finance, & Analytics
Table of ContentsWhat is Commercial Speech? How is Commercial Speech protected under the 1st Amendment?Discussion QuestionPractice QuestionAcademic Research
What is Commercial Speech?
Commercial speech is any speech related to a business entity, brand, practice, or product.
Commercial speech is only partially protected under the 1st Amendment from infringement by Government law or action.
Next Article: Defamation & the 1st Amendment Back to: CONSTITUTIONAL LAW
How is Commercial Speech protected under the 1st Amendment?
There is only a limited right to undertake commercial speech. Such expressions necessarily involve third parties who take actions based upon that speech. The government's regulation of commercial speech is based upon the potentially negative effect on the general welfare of society. The limitation upon the regulation of commercial speech is that the government must have a compelling state interest to justify the restriction.
- Note: Common law holds that corporations have limited rights to free speech that are very similar to those of individuals. The Constitutional standards applied by a court when determining the validity of government laws or actions limiting an individual's rights are discussed in a separate section.
- Example: Business practices that knowingly deceive individuals may constitute fraud. Many deceptive advertising practices violate consumer protection laws. The federal and state governments require disclosure of material information about publicly-held companies. All of these examples demonstrate a balance between protecting the public and protecting the freedom of speech afforded individuals.
- What is the 1st Amendment?
- What are the Establishment Clause and Free Exercise Clause
- How does freedom of religion affect business practice?
- What is the protection of Freedom of Speech?
- Speech with Limited or No Protection
- What is Obscene Speech?
- What are Fighting Words?
- What is Defamation?
- What is Political Speech?
- Overbreadth and Overly Broad Laws
- Freedom of the Press
- Freedom of Assembly
Can you think of any type of commercial speech that is prohibited by federal, state, and local laws? What is the risk to the public of allowing this type of unregulated speech?
- Input on Discussion: Think about laws concerning fraud or misrepresentation. Also, think about the various agencies charged with regulating this type of speech (Hint: SEC, FTC, FBI, etc.). The risk is the financial harm to the individual who is affected by this speech.
Hickory, NC is famous for its production of fine wood furniture. Every year, thousands of people and stores come to Hickory to purchase furniture. Numerous companies that produce their furniture in other places have opened shops in Hickory to sell to customers. These companies routinely assemble the pieces of furniture in Hickory and advertise the furniture as Made in Hickory. The town passes an ordinance prohibiting this practice. If a merchant challenges the ordinance, what will the court examine in determining whether the ordinance is constitutionally valid.
- The court would likely examine the purpose or goal behind the ordinance. It would then determine whether the objective is compelling in nature. It would determine whether the ordinance is the sole manner of achieving that objective. It would also weigh this rule against the potential harm suffered by customers purchasing these products, the venders who actually produce their goods in Hickory, and the town of Hickory's reputation.