Resources Process Values Framework - Explained
What is the Resources Process Values Framework?
If you still have questions or prefer to get help directly from an agent, please submit a request.
We’ll get back to you as soon as possible.
- Marketing, Advertising, Sales & PR
- Accounting, Taxation, and Reporting
- Professionalism & Career Development
Law, Transactions, & Risk Management
Government, Legal System, Administrative Law, & Constitutional Law Legal Disputes - Civil & Criminal Law Agency Law HR, Employment, Labor, & Discrimination Business Entities, Corporate Governance & Ownership Business Transactions, Antitrust, & Securities Law Real Estate, Personal, & Intellectual Property Commercial Law: Contract, Payments, Security Interests, & Bankruptcy Consumer Protection Insurance & Risk Management Immigration Law Environmental Protection Law Inheritance, Estates, and Trusts
- Business Management & Operations
- Economics, Finance, & Analytics
Table of ContentsWhat is the Resources Processes Values Framework?What are Resources in the Organization?What are Processes in the Organization?What are Values in the Organization?Academic Research on Resources/Processes/Values Framework
What is the Resources Processes Values Framework?
The Resources Processes Values Framework is utilized to efficiently allocate employees to certain tasks or responsibilities. Three sets of factors have an effect on what an organization's capabilities, its processes, resources, and values.
What are Resources in the Organization?
Resources include equipment, people, product designs, technology, information, cash, brands, and relationships with suppliers, customers, and distributors. They should be valuable and flexible.
What are Processes in the Organization?
Organizations create value as employees function to convert resource inputs into products and services of higher value. Processes refer to the interaction, communication, decision making, and coordination. Processes comprise not only manufacturing processes but those through which market research, procurement, product development, employee development, employee compensation, budgeting and allocation of resources are accomplished.
Processes evolve de facto or are defined in a bid to address certain tasks. This implies that when managers utilize a process in the execution of tasks for which it was created, it would most likely function effectively. Contrary to resource flexibility, processes are inherently inflexible. Hence, a process which defines its ability in carrying out a specific task concurrently defines its inabilities in carrying out other tasks. In order to ensure consistency, processes should not be changed. In cases where they do, they should change through strictly controlled procedures. Good managers focus on aligning tasks and processes.
What are Values in the Organization?
An organizations values are the third class of factors which affect what an organization can accomplish. Values, by definition, has an ethical meaning. The values of an organization are the prerequisites through which employees prioritize decision making. Employees at all levels make decisions concerning priorities. A major metric of good management is whether these precise and consistent values have penetrated the organization.
By necessity, a company's values must reflect its business model and cost structure, because they state the rules its employees must abide by for the company to succeed. The values of profitable firms likely evolve in a predictable manner on a minimum of two dimensions. The first dimension is related to acceptable gross margins. Companies usually add overhead cost just as they include features, as well as, functionality to their products and services in a bid to get more attractive customers. As a result of this, gross margins which at a point were absolutely attractive, eventually become unattractive at a later stage. Their values alter or change.
The next dimension within which values change relates to market size. The market opportunity size necessary to meet a company's growth needs varies.
Academic Research on Resources/Processes/Values Framework
- A quarter century of Culture's Consequences: a review of empirical research incorporating Hofstede's cultural values framework, Kirkman, B. L., Lowe, K. B., & Gibson, C. B. (2006). Journal of international business studies, 37(3), 285-320. This research work analyzes Geert Hofstedes cultural values framework which has been used by many researchers in various empirical studies. This paper reviews 180 works published in 40 psychology and business journal and 2 international annual editions from 1980 to June 2002 in order to strengthen what is empirically confirmable concerning Hofstedes cultural values framework. The limitations in his research are discussed and recommendations are made for researchers who would use his theory in the future.
- A values framework for measuring the impact of workplace spirituality on organizational performance, Jurkiewicz, C. L., & Giacalone, R. A. (2004). Journal of business ethics, 49(2), 129-142. This paper focuses on how organizational performance is affected by workplace spirituality. Workplace spirituality has been discovered to bring about new paradigm development in organizational science. Assumptions from theories show how workplace spirituality may improve organizational performance, most assuming an evident positive effect. This body of research is reviewed, as well as, analyzed and a values framework based on workplace spirituality is introduced. This framework provides the foundation for empirical testing. Factors and assumptions needed for future research are discussed.
- The competing values framework: Understanding the impact of organizational culture on the quality of work life, Goodman, E. A., Zammuto, R. F., & Gifford, B. D. (2001). Organization Development Journal, 19(3), 58. This article explicates how organizational culture affects work-life quality. The competing values framework is used in this article In order to examine the relationships between organizational culture and some important job-based variables. The findings show that group cultural values have a positive relationship with job involvement, organizational commitment, job satisfaction, and empowerment, and they have negative relations with intent to turnover. Hence, hierarchical cultural values have a negative relationship with organizational commitment, and job involvement, empowerment, and also job satisfaction have a positive relationship with intent to turnover.
- A competing values framework for analyzing presentational communication in management contexts, Quinn, R. E., Hildebrandt, H. W., Rogers, P. S., & Thompson, M. P. (1991). The Journal of Business Communication (1973), 28(3), 213-232. For a long time, communication experts have been keen on analyzing messages. Of recent, they have emphasized the need for evaluative tools which account for constraints and situational expectations. In this research work, an empirical model that can be applied to presentational communication was created based on an inference from the literature on organizational and managerial effectiveness. About 100 communication professors examined how relevant descriptors are based on six various types of business presentations. Three were oral while the other three were written. Similarity scores were created based on their judgments and these were released for multidimensional scaling.
- Using the competing values framework to investigate the culture of Qatar industries, Al-Khalifa, K. N., & Aspinwall, E. M. (2001). Total Quality Management, 12(4), 417-428. This research paper examines the culture of Qatar industries with a focus on the competing values framework. The past decade witnessed a tremendous rise in awareness, as well as, the implementation incidents of total quality management (TQM). But, not every application has been a success. Amongst the numerous reasons given for its failures, the literature frequently lays emphasis on the major barrier being the limiting effect of an organizations culture. This paper examines how compatible the culture that exists in Qatar industries is and which needed the implementation of TQM. The results showed that many organizations in Qatar did not have only one cultural type but a blend of two. This mix didnt match the cultural profile features supporting TQM.
- The integrated competing values framework: Its spatial configuration, Vilkinas, T., & Cartan, G. (2006). Journal of Management Development, 25(6), 505-521. This article identifies the spaced relationships between the managerial positions in the ICVF, known as the integrated competing values framework. Furthermore, this study attempts to identify the major role which the integrator performs with its functions critical learning function.
- Strategic human resource management and its effects on firm performance: an implementation of the competing values framework, Panayotopoulou, L., Bourantas, D., & Papalexandris, N. (2003). International Journal of Human Resource Management, 14(4), 680-699. A new HRM model is developed in this paper using the competing values framework. The work attempts to clarify the exact type of HRM that is linked with different parts of a firms performance. In a bid to get a better understanding of this researched area, three extra factors which influence this relationship have been included in the equation. They include external environment, competitive strategy, and size of the organization. This research was carried out among a sample of exactly 104 organizations and the location was Greece. It is discovered that HRM control negatively affects market performance while its flexibility positively influences market performance.
- Implications of the competing values framework for management information systems, Cooper, R. B., & Quinn, R. E. (1993). Human Resource Management, 32(1), 175-201. The lack of a management information system (MIS) effectiveness theory is the resultant effect of the problems with evaluating MIS effectiveness. Drawing from the Competing Values Framework in order to develop the MIS effectiveness theory which is based on both MIS and organizational literature. This framework is used to guide the evaluation of MIS effectiveness.
- Measuring leadership in selfmanaged teams using the competing values framework, Zafft, C. R., Adams, S. G., & Matkin, G. S. (2009). Journal of Engineering Education, 98(3), 273-282. This study shows how the Competing Values Framework (CVF) is applied to self-managed teams (SMTs) and how this application helps engineering educators to comprehend how to quantify leadership in this context and bring about an increased consciousness of the students in the team, which would result in increased effectiveness. Behavioral complexity ascertains the ability of the team to use many leadership roles and also subsequent effectiveness. The discovery shows that behavioral complexity has a major impact on performance but its effect is not significant on team members attitudes. When the relationship between leadership in self-managed teams and effectiveness is explored, educators, as well as, industry can better comprehend the leadership role types needed for achieving a highly efficient team.
- Using the competing values framework to assess corporate ethical codes, Stevens, B. (1996). The Journal of Business Communication (1973), 33(1), 71-84. Ethical codes refer to written documents that presume to state the organizations main philosophical principle and to also express its beliefs and values. The current study makes use of a competing values framework in order to describe the ethical code dimensions, explaining how instructional, change-oriented and instructional, relational, and informational they are in their communication and also as representatives of the organizational culture.