Social Loafing - Explained
If you still have questions or prefer to get help directly from an agent, please submit a request.
We’ll get back to you as soon as possible.
- Marketing, Advertising, Sales & PR
- Accounting, Taxation, and Reporting
- Professionalism & Career Development
Law, Transactions, & Risk Management
Government, Legal System, Administrative Law, & Constitutional Law Legal Disputes - Civil & Criminal Law Agency Law HR, Employment, Labor, & Discrimination Business Entities, Corporate Governance & Ownership Business Transactions, Antitrust, & Securities Law Real Estate, Personal, & Intellectual Property Commercial Law: Contract, Payments, Security Interests, & Bankruptcy Consumer Protection Insurance & Risk Management Immigration Law Environmental Protection Law Inheritance, Estates, and Trusts
- Business Management & Operations
- Economics, Finance, & Analytics
What is Social Loafing?
Social loafing, also known as the Ringelmann Effect, occurs when members of a group do not work as hard simply because they are in the group context rather than working individually.
Back to: Business Management
The tendency of social loafing was first identified by Max Ringelmann in 1913. His studies demonstrated that when pulling on a rope (such as in tug of war), individuals do not pull as hard when part of a group. Interestingly, as the size of the group grows, this effect becomes more prominent.
The belief is that individuals are less motivated because they feel as though their contribution has less impact on success or failure.
Concepts Related to Social Loafing
Related concepts are the:
What is the Free rider effect?
The free-rider effect is when individuals consciously work less under the belief that others will do their share of the work.
What is the Sucker effect?
The sucker effect is when individuals reduce their efforts because they are put off by the unfairness of having the free-rider in the group. The sucker effect and free-rider effect demonstrate the effect of perceptions of fairness or equity in the situation. Perceptions of fairness have been shown to affect social loafing. That is, social loafing is less common in groups that distribute work and reward fairly or perceive that everyone pulls their weight.