Open Systems Model (Katz and Kahn) - Explained
What is the Open System Model of Katz and Kahn?
- Marketing, Advertising, Sales & PR
- Accounting, Taxation, and Reporting
- Professionalism & Career Development
-
Law, Transactions, & Risk Management
Government, Legal System, Administrative Law, & Constitutional Law Legal Disputes - Civil & Criminal Law Agency Law HR, Employment, Labor, & Discrimination Business Entities, Corporate Governance & Ownership Business Transactions, Antitrust, & Securities Law Real Estate, Personal, & Intellectual Property Commercial Law: Contract, Payments, Security Interests, & Bankruptcy Consumer Protection Insurance & Risk Management Immigration Law Environmental Protection Law Inheritance, Estates, and Trusts
- Business Management & Operations
- Economics, Finance, & Analytics
- Courses
What is the Open System Model of Katz and Kahn?
The open systems model, proposed by Katz and Kahn, developed a framework for open-systems theory that encompasses:
- (1) energic inputs into the organizations;
- (2) the transformation of those inputs within the system;
- (3) energic outputs; and
- (4) recycling.
Energic inputs, or external influences, include familiar resources like employees, raw materials, and capital. However, they also include intangible external influences, such as status, recognition, satisfaction, or other personal rewards.
The transformation process involves using energies, or inputs, to create products or services. Energic outputs are simply the products or services that are distributed to consumers.
Finally, recycling refers to the fact that outputs are indirectly recycled back into the organization. For instance, when a company sells a toaster the revenue becomes an input into the organization that is used, for example, to pay workers or buy materials.
In addition to identifying the four phases of an open system, Katz and Kahn cataloged several other organizational characteristics that support the open systems theory and have implications for the design of successful organizations.
For example, they recognized the universal law of entropy, which holds that all organizations move toward disorganization or death. However, an open system can continue to thrive by importing more energy from the environment than it expends, thus achieving negative entropy. For example, a failing company might be able to revitalize itself by bringing in a new chief executive who improves the way the company transforms energic inputs.
Another characteristic of organizations is dynamic homeostasis, which infers that all successful organizations must be able to achieve balance between subsystems. Thus, subgroups must maintain a rough state of balance as they adapt to external influences.
Katz and Kahn also characterize open systems by equifiniality. This concept suggests that organizations can reach the same final state by a number of different paths. In fact, the course is not fixed and may develop organically as both internal and external influences intervene.