Back to: ECONOMICS, FINANCE, & ACCOUNTING
Buy Side (Wall Street) Definition
Buy-side is the face of the Wall Street constructed by institutional investors like mutual funds, pension funds in addition to insurance firms that tenders in purchasing a high volume of securities for purposes of financial management. Sell-side being the antonym of Purchase side, deals with the provision of endorsements of public market’s upgrade, reduction, price objective, and additional issues. Buy-side complements sell-side making up Wall Street
A Little More on What is Buy Side
Buy-side firms deal with the acquiring of securities and other assets for their benefits or that of their customer’s. Besides mutual funds, pension funds and insurance companies, private equity funds, hedge funds, and individual traders are also members of buy-side. Although the sell-side recommendations are provided to the public, buy-side recommendation isis private to the institution, and any applicable method, vision, formula developed by the buy side analysts are confidentially maintained.
Ideally, buy-side investments are valued for firm’s or its customer value creation by establishing and purchasing assets whose market values are lower than book value. Given that the security prices are affected greatly by the market economic responses, the buy side is appropriate when the method is confidentially kept from the public. For instance when a buy-side analyst becomes aware of the technology stock price to be lower than its fellow group although it performs highly based on the propriety financial model that the analyst uses, then the analyst can conclude of the company stocks to be undervalued and advice his clients for the purchase of the said stocks. On the other hand, if the analyst decides to make the findings to the public, then the low priced stock will be lost as many will demand the said stock and with the economic market forces of demand and supply, the equilibrium price will rise hence making the stock price to increase.
Because of confidentiality needed for buy-side, companies that employ both buy-side and sell-side analysts a boundary is created separating the two sides. Although there are cases where investment banks with both buy-side and sell-side may decide to minimize the boundary created. There is a possibility of a buy-side exiting analyst endorsing a selling side analyst to make a recommendation, and this conveniently results from sharing price increase before sales.
A buy-side analyst undertakes financial research and strategy development of a company. In the development of a company’s strategy, a lot of research and financial modeling are involved. Buy-side analysts’ research is specific to whether a specific investment is appropriate and is for maximum value addition to the company.
References for Buy Side
Academic Research on Buy Side
- Buy–side vs. sell-side analysts’ earnings forecasts, Groysberg, B., Healy, P., & Chapman, C. (2008). Financial Analysts Journal, 64(4), 25-39. This paper states the earning versus forecasting performance comparison of analysts at a large company buy-side company with another analyst from sell side in the year 1997 to 2004. Buy-side was of more optimism and lesser forecast than the sell-side analysts as a result of retaining poorly performing analysts by buy-side and the use of various yardsticks in the performance evaluation of from buy side and sell side.
- Buy–side analysts, sell-side analysts, and investment decisions of money managers, Cheng, Y., Liu, M. H., & Qian, J. (2006). Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 41(1), 51-83. The paper is about the examination of financial analysts in coming up with the institutional investor decisions. The model used showed that it is the role of a fund manager to undertake investments in stock-based optimal findings on both biased sell-side analysts and unbiases sell analysts. The is a lot of emphasis on the reports when the buy-side analyst information quality compared to that sell-side analyst rises. There was evidence found to support the model forecasting the weight the managers allocate ton buy-side research compared to the sell side and those found without involving both buy-side and sell-side analysts.
- Buy–side trades and sell-side recommendations: Interactions and information content, Busse, J. A., Green, T. C., & Jegadeesh, N. (2012). Journal of Financial Markets, 15(2), 207-232. The author examined in the buy-side institutional analysts and sell-side brokerage analyst performance on stock recommendations. Buy-side uses the stock recommendations, but sell-side do not use that of buy-side. With these recommendations variation, buy side and their sell-side conducts business in the same sell-side recommendations. These changes yield similar returns as sell-side hence the institutional investor’s exhibition is not of special skills in comprehending the recommendation quality.
- A review of the empirical disclosure literature: discussion, Core, J. E. (2001). Journal of Accounting and Economics, 31(1-3), 441-456. Healy and Palepu, J. Account. Econ. (2001). The author talks about the need for empiric exposure reassessment of literature and assumes policies of the firms regarding the exposure that are ascertained within the company by similar management that develops the structure and undertakes incentive provisions. The similarity in the management provides a strong view to literature in addition to the provision of possible justification regarding the reassessment outcome and particular opinion regarding the forecasted study.
- Factors affecting earnings forecast revisions for the buy–side and sell-side analyst, Williams, P. A., Moyes, G. D., & Park, K. (1996). Accounting Horizons, 10(3), 112. The author illustrates the benefits of the earnings forecasts and the prediction revisions of sell-side analysts as the originator of information against which investors base their decisions regarding the future earnings and firm profitability in addition to investment decisions. Earlier findings also showed the correlations between stock market returns and the analysts’ prediction revisions. The study also indicated that the individual investor’s dependence on the analysts for their information
- Do buy–side analysts out-perform the sell-side?, Groysberg, B., Healy, P., Chapman, C., Shanthikumar, D., & Gui, Y. (2007). The study was based on the comparison of the buy-side compared to sell-side performance. The study showed the less optimistic recommendations made by buy-side in large investments than their sell-side counterparts. Less optimism is directly related to their few conflicts of interests. Sell-side recommendations outperform buy-side whose income predictions are optimistic in addition to being falsely stated. Sell side’s higher retention of analysts whose performance is wanting partly explains the performance variations in addition to the use of different yardstick in the valuation.
- The non-linear market impact of large trades: Evidence from buy–side order flow, Bershova, N., & Rakhlin, D. (2013). Quantitative Finance, 13(11), 1759-1778. There was empirical examination conducted in the large institutional orders undertaken in the US equity market. The study was on the price reversion upon trade completion. The finding was that permanent effect is the square root function of the duration of the trade. The trade duration is the total influence seen at the final fill is approximately two-thirds. There was confirmation that post-trade price gets back to a level equivalent to normal pricing environment, Effect decay is of longtime activity estimated by the power law in the initial fewer minutes after completing order and followed by exponential deterioration
- The stock selection and performance of buy–side analysts, Groysberg, B., Healy, P., Serafeim, G., & Shanthikumar, D. (2013). Management Science, 59(5), 1062-1075. Even though investment companies perform their buy-side study themselves, there is still stock selection and recommendation incentives that they face than their fellow sell-side analysts. The findings in the research were that the buy-side recommendations were less optimistic for larger market capitalization stock and lower variations than their colleagues from the sale side this is in line with the few conflicts of interests they go through besides their preference to liquid stock. The was no variation found to be existing in the performance between buy-side analyst recommendation and those from sell-side upon control of the selection effects.
- The influence of buy–side analysts on mutual fund trading, Frey, S., & Herbst, P. (2014). Journal of Banking & Finance, 49, 442-458. The facts presented was based on the buy-side analysts trading and performance effects. Buy-side analysts were found to significantly affects trading decisions. Buy-side analysts were found to be more influential than their sell-side counterparts as fund managers followed the recommendations regardless of the control determinants that were put in place. Also, mutual fund traders performance also showed the favorable extraordinary returns of the buy-side.
- The activities of buy–side analysts and the determinants of their stock recommendations, Brown, L. D., Call, A. C., Clement, M. B., & Sharp, N. Y. (2016). Journal of Accounting and Economics, 62(1), 139-156. The study of 344 buy-side analysts from 181 and performance of 16 comprehensive assessments understand the buy-side analyst’s performance, their compensation factors, stock recommendation inputs, their financial reporting quality belief and the importance of sell-side in a buy-side study. The main finding was that there was obvious usefulness of 10-k reports than those quarterly conferences and management provisions for stock recommendations by buy-side. Also,, it was found that sell-side value addition to buy-side is based on the provision of deeper industrial knowledge in addition to reaching company decision makers.
- Buy–Side and Sell-Side: The Industrial Organization of Information Production in the Securities Industry, Chen, Z. (2004). The study is based on the division of the information generation between buy-side and sell-side companies. Agents producing similar information have the discretion of being in either buy-side or sell-side analysts. The findings indicated that for there to be a balance; then there was a need for the provision of subsidy failure to which analysts would be profitably outcompeted by fund managers. The author justifies the availability of separate study and fee arrangements in the companies dealing with the rating of credits.