### Type I Error Definition

A type I error is a type of error that occurs in statistical hypothesis testing in which a true null hypothesis is rejected. When a null hypothesis which is actually true is rejected when it should not be, a type I error has occurred. In statistical hypothesis testing, a null hypothesis is often established before the test. A type I is also called a ‘false positive’ finding or conclusion, it is an error of rejecting a true null hypothesis that should otherwise not be rejected. This error thereby accepts an alternative hypothesis when the results of the test are still subject to probability.

### A Little More on What is Type I Error

A type I error often occurs when there is an absence of a relationship between the item being tested, the stimuli applied and the outcome. A Type I error is called a ‘false positive’ finding or conclusion that occurs when the outcome of a hypothesis test is caused by something outside of the stimuli or caused by chance. When there is no connection between the tets subject and the stimuli, a false positive is given. When this happens, there is a rejection of a null hypothesis which is actually true and meant to be accepted.

### Example of a Type I Error

A type I error can occur in diverse fields and various testings, for instance, if a new drug is being tested in a medical laboratory, a type I error when the drug is taken to be an effective remedy for a particular illness when it is actually not. In the legal field, a type I error occurs when an innocent person is sent to jail when he should not have been. One common attribute of type I errors is that something which should not have been rejected is rejected or something which should not have been accepted is accepted.

### References for “**Type I Error****”**

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Type_I_and_type_II_errors

https://www.investopedia.com › Business › Business Leaders › Math & Statistics

https://corporatefinanceinstitute.com › Resources › Knowledge › Other

### Academic research for “**Type I Error****”**

Type I and Type II error concerns in fMRI research: re-balancing the scale, **Lieberman, M. D., & Cunningham, W. A. (2009). Type I and Type II error concerns in fMRI research: re-balancing the scale. ***Social cognitive and affective neuroscience***, ***4***(4), 423-428.**

Evaluating **type I error **and power rates using an effect size measure with the logistic regression procedure for DIF detection, **Jodoin, M. G., & Gierl, M. J. (2001). Evaluating type I error and power rates using an effect size measure with the logistic regression procedure for DIF detection. ***Applied measurement in education***, ***14***(4), 329-349.**

Group sequential designs using a family of **type I error **probability spending functions, **Hwang, I. K., Shih, W. J., & De Cani, J. S. (1990). Group sequential designs using a family of type I error probability spending functions. ***Statistics in medicine***, ***9***(12), 1439-1445.**

Design and analysis of group sequential tests based on the **type I error **spending rate function, **Kim, K., & Demets, D. L. (1987). Design and analysis of group sequential tests based on the type I error spending rate function. ***Biometrika***, ***74***(1), 149-154.**

Simulation studies of the effects of small sample size and studied item parameters on SIBTEST and Mantel‐Haenszel **Type I error **performance, **Roussos, L. A., & Stout, W. F. (1996). Simulation studies of the effects of small sample size and studied item parameters on SIBTEST and Mantel****‐****Haenszel Type I error performance. ***Journal of Educational Measurement***, ***33***(2), 215-230.**

**Type I error **rate comparisons of post hoc procedures for I j Chi-Square tables, **MacDonald, P. L., & Gardner, R. C. (2000). Type I error rate comparisons of post hoc procedures for I j Chi-Square tables. ***Educational and psychological measurement***, ***60***(5), 735-754.**

Comparison of **type I error **rates for statistical analyses of resource selection, **Bingham, R. L., & Brennan, L. A. (2004). Comparison of type I error rates for statistical analyses of resource selection. ***The Journal of Wildlife Management***, ***68***(1), 206-212.**

**Type I error **and the number of iterations in Monte Carlo studies of robustness, **Robey, R. R., & Barcikowski, R. S. (1992). Type I error and the number of iterations in Monte Carlo studies of robustness. ***British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology***, ***45***(2), 283-288.**

Multiple testing. Part I. Single-step procedures for control of general **type I error **rates, **Dudoit, S., van der Laan, M. J., & Pollard, K. S. (2004). Multiple testing. Part I. Single-step procedures for control of general type I error rates. ***Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology***, ***3***(1), 1-69.**