Article IV Territorial Courts - Explained
Authority for Courts within US Territories, Provinces, and Protectorates
If you still have questions or prefer to get help directly from an agent, please submit a request.
We’ll get back to you as soon as possible.
- Marketing, Advertising, Sales & PR
- Accounting, Taxation, and Reporting
- Professionalism & Career Development
Law, Transactions, & Risk Management
Government, Legal System, Administrative Law, & Constitutional Law Legal Disputes - Civil & Criminal Law Agency Law HR, Employment, Labor, & Discrimination Business Entities, Corporate Governance & Ownership Business Transactions, Antitrust, & Securities Law Real Estate, Personal, & Intellectual Property Commercial Law: Contract, Payments, Security Interests, & Bankruptcy Consumer Protection Insurance & Risk Management Immigration Law Environmental Protection Law Inheritance, Estates, and Trusts
- Business Management & Operations
- Economics, Finance, & Analytics
What are Article 4 Courts?
Article IV courts are US Territorial Courts, such as those of Guam, Northern Mariana Islands, and the US Virgin Islands, established under the Territory Clause of Article IV.
Next Article: Constitutional Authority for State Courts Back to: US COURT SYSTEM
- What is the Authority for Article III Courts?
- What is the Authority for Article I Courts?
- What is the authority for courts under Article II?
- What is the authority for Article IV Territorial Courts?
- What is the authority for State Courts?
- What are Article III Courts?
- What are Article I Administrative Courts?
- What are state courts?
Think about the formation of courts in these jurisdictions. These are not states and, therefore, Congress must act to establish courts with jurisdiction over these protectorates. How do you feel about territories of the United States that are not represented in the Federal Government, but are subject to federal jurisdiction?
- Some would argue that subjecting a jurisdiction to federal law without representation within the established government runs afoul of principles of democracy. The same argument applies to the District of Columbia, whose license tags read, taxation without representation. Others would argue that protectorates lack the status of a state and the US Constitution is clear that only states are afforded federal representatives.
In the US Territory of Guam, Hanna is the victim of a crime when someone steals her automobile. What laws would be affected in this scenario and how would this situation differ from a similar occurrence in California?
- If Hanna were located in California, the crime against her property would likely be subject to state law. If a defendant were apprehended, he or she would face charges in state court. Guam is not a state and does not have a state court. Rather, the trial court of Guam is the District Court of Guam, a federal trial court. This court is authorized under Article IV of the US Constitution.