Workplace Privacy Laws
ECPA and EPPA
If you still have questions or prefer to get help directly from an agent, please submit a request.
We’ll get back to you as soon as possible.
- Marketing, Advertising, Sales & PR
- Accounting, Taxation, and Reporting
- Professionalism & Career Development
Law, Transactions, & Risk Management
Government, Legal System, Administrative Law, & Constitutional Law Legal Disputes - Civil & Criminal Law Agency Law HR, Employment, Labor, & Discrimination Business Entities, Corporate Governance & Ownership Business Transactions, Antitrust, & Securities Law Real Estate, Personal, & Intellectual Property Commercial Law: Contract, Payments, Security Interests, & Bankruptcy Consumer Protection Insurance & Risk Management Immigration Law Environmental Protection Law Inheritance, Estates, and Trusts
- Business Management & Operations
- Economics, Finance, & Analytics
Table of ContentsWhat worker privacy laws apply to the workplace?What is the Electronic Communication Privacy Act (ECPA)?What are the exceptions to the Electronic Communication Privacy Act (ECPA)?What is the Employee Polygraph Protection Act (EPPA)? What is Employee Drug Testing?Discussion QuestionPractice QuestionAcademic Research
What worker privacy laws apply to the workplace?
Two primary federal acts provide for rights of privacy of employees with regard to their personal communications - the Electronic Communication Privacy Act (ECPA) and the Employee Polygraph Protection Act.
Next Article: What are Labor Laws? Back to: EMPLOYMENT LAWS
What is the Electronic Communication Privacy Act (ECPA)?
The ECPA prohibits the recording or monitoring of employee's private conversations without the employee's knowledge. That is, an employee has an expectation of privacy with regard to her personal communications in the workplace. As such, an employer cannot infringe upon an employee's privacy by monitoring those communications.
What are the exceptions to the Electronic Communication Privacy Act (ECPA)?
There are, however, several glaring exceptions to this rule.
Business Equipment - An employee has no right to privacy when employing the employer's equipment to communicate.
Example: An employer can monitor employee communications, such as emails, chat logs, search history, etc., if done on a business computer, phone, copier, etc.
Security - An employer may undertake reasonable monitoring of employee conversations if done for purposes of security or operational quality. The best manner to comply with this law is to disclose to employees any monitoring of communications.
Example: An employer may have surveillance cameras in the workplace, but the ability to record audio is limited.
What is the Employee Polygraph Protection Act (EPPA)?
The EPPA prohibits private employers from using a polygraph while screening job applicants. That is, an employee or prospective employee cannot be compelled to submit to a polygraph as a condition of employment. There are certain exceptions for current employees who may be the subject of inquiry or personnel in sensitive industries.
Example: In some instances, private security firms and firms that manufacture or sell controlled substances may subject employees or applicants to polygraph examination based upon the sensitive nature of the position.
What is Employee Drug Testing?
Some states place limits on the ability of an employer to conduct drug tests on employees. These laws generally do not apply to job applicants.
How do you feel about the federal or state governments regulating the ability of private businesses to infringe upon the privacy of workers? Are these provisions too restrictive or not protective enough of employees? Why? Do you believe that these laws accomplish the underlying objectives?
Erin is applying to work as a government contractor for Halliburton oil consulting. This position will require her to embed in US military units to negotiate oil contracts in war-torn, Middle-Eastern countries. Does Halliburton have the ability to require Erin to submit to a polygraph during the application process or once she is an employee?