Res Judicata - Explained
What is Res Judicata?
If you still have questions or prefer to get help directly from an agent, please submit a request.
We’ll get back to you as soon as possible.
- Marketing, Advertising, Sales & PR
- Accounting, Taxation, and Reporting
- Professionalism & Career Development
Law, Transactions, & Risk Management
Government, Legal System, Administrative Law, & Constitutional Law Legal Disputes - Civil & Criminal Law Agency Law HR, Employment, Labor, & Discrimination Business Entities, Corporate Governance & Ownership Business Transactions, Antitrust, & Securities Law Real Estate, Personal, & Intellectual Property Commercial Law: Contract, Payments, Security Interests, & Bankruptcy Consumer Protection Insurance & Risk Management Immigration Law Environmental Protection Law Inheritance, Estates, and Trusts
- Business Management & Operations
- Economics, Finance, & Analytics
Table of ContentsWhat is Res Judicata?What is Res Judicata in civil trials?Discussion QuestionPractice QuestionAcademic Research
What is Res Judicata?
Res Judicata is a legal expression meaning that the civil legal dispute between the parties to litigation is decided.
Return to: CIVIL LITIGATION Next Chapter: ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION
How does Res Judicata Work?
Res Judicata is a principle prevents successive lawsuits involving the same facts or occurrence.
A plaintiff may not sue the defendant for the same conduct under the same or a separate cause of action.
The separate cause of action should have been raised during the initial trial. It brings the dispute to a conclusion.
Compare the principle or res judicata to the principle of double jeopardy in criminal cases. How are they similar? Different?
- The two principles are similar in many ways. In effect, they both prevent the retrial of the same case (or issues in a case) that had previously been heard and determined by the court. The court cannot listen to the matter again if it is based on the same facts or occurrence.
Tom is suing Isabelle for assault. Isabelle allegedly approached Tom in a public restaurant and slapped him in the face. The jury returns a verdict of not liable on the grounds that Isabelle was temporarily incapacitated by rage at seeing her boyfriend having dinner with another woman. Tom is outraged by the verdict and seeks to sue Isabelle a second time for battery. Can Tom sue Isabelle for battery after losing the first trial alleging assault?
- Tom cannot bring an action against Isabelle again. This is based on the doctrine of Res Judicata. An action for battery would be based upon the same conduct that was adjudicated in the prior trial.