Conversion - Explained
Civil Action for Wrongfully Depriving Somone of their Property
- Marketing, Advertising, Sales & PR
- Accounting, Taxation, and Reporting
- Professionalism & Career Development
-
Law, Transactions, & Risk Management
Government, Legal System, Administrative Law, & Constitutional Law Legal Disputes - Civil & Criminal Law Agency Law HR, Employment, Labor, & Discrimination Business Entities, Corporate Governance & Ownership Business Transactions, Antitrust, & Securities Law Real Estate, Personal, & Intellectual Property Commercial Law: Contract, Payments, Security Interests, & Bankruptcy Consumer Protection Insurance & Risk Management Immigration Law Environmental Protection Law Inheritance, Estates, and Trusts
- Business Management & Operations
- Economics, Finance, & Analytics
- Courses
Table of Contents
What is Conversion?What is required for a Conversion action?Discussion QuestionPractice QuestionAcademic ResearchWhat is Conversion?
Conversion is a civil cause of action for taking another persons property without her consent.
Next Article: Defamation Return to: TORT LAW
What is required for a Conversion action?
Conversion entails the wrongful exercise of dominion (power) and control over the personal (non-land) resources of someone else.
In doing so, a person violates the owner's lawful right to exclude others from her resources.
The deprivation may be temporary or permanent, but it must constitute a serious invasion of the owner's legal rights.
- Example: Stealing something from an employer is conversion as is purchasing something that has been stolen. Failing to return something at a designated time, delivering something to the wrong party, and destruction or alteration of someone else's property also constitutes a conversion.
Related Topics
- What are Intentional Torts?
- Assault and Battery?
- Intentional Infliction of Emotions Distress?
- Invasion of Privacy?
- False Imprisonment?
- Malicious Prosecution?
- Trespass?
- Defamation?
- Defenses to Defamation?
- Fraud?
Discussion Question
What level of interference with another person's use and enjoyment should be considered conversion? How does the nature of the deprivation affect your opinion? Does the length of deprivation affect your opinion? Should the interference be intention? How would you balance the rights of an innocent transferee of the property against the rights of the original owner?
Practice Question
Ervin purchases a luxury watch from Carl. Carl claims to have received the watch as a gift. In reality, Carl stole the watch from Todd. Todd learns that Ervin has possession of his watch, what are his options for securing its return?
- The tort of conversion occurs when a person intentionally interferes with personal property belonging to another person. To make out a conversion claim, a plaintiff must establish the following elements:
- That the plaintiff owns or has the right to possess the personal property in question at the time of the interference.
- That the defendant intentionally interfered with the plaintiff's personal property.
- That the interference deprived the plaintiff of possession or use of the personal property in question.
- That the interference caused damages to the plaintiff.
In the example of the practice question, Todd has the option of suing Carl for the tort of conversion.
Academic Research
- Douglas, Simon, The Scope of Conversion: Property and Contract (May 2011). The Modern Law Review, Vol. 74, Issue 3, pp. 329-349, 2011. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1830959or http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2230.2011.00850.x