Trust in a Negotiation - Explained
How does Trust Affect Negotiation?
Written by J. Mance Gordon
Updated at April 22nd, 2024
- Marketing, Advertising, Sales & PR
- Accounting, Taxation, and Reporting
- Professionalism & Career Development
-
Law, Transactions, & Risk Management
Government, Legal System, Administrative Law, & Constitutional Law Legal Disputes - Civil & Criminal Law Agency Law HR, Employment, Labor, & Discrimination Business Entities, Corporate Governance & Ownership Business Transactions, Antitrust, & Securities Law Real Estate, Personal, & Intellectual Property Commercial Law: Contract, Payments, Security Interests, & Bankruptcy Consumer Protection Insurance & Risk Management Immigration Law Environmental Protection Law Inheritance, Estates, and Trusts
- Business Management & Operations
- Economics, Finance, & Analytics
What Creates Trust in a Negotiation?
There are three factors that contribute to the level of trust one negotiator may have for another:
- Disposition - the individual's chronic disposition toward trust;
- Context - the situational factors (context surrounding or giving rise to the dispute or conflict); and
- Relationship - the history or prior relationship between the parties.
Likewise, there are 3 types of trust present in any relationship.
What are the Types of Trust in a Negotiation?
What is Deterrence-based trust?
This is a type of trust that sustains behavioral consistency through threats or promises of consequences that will result if consistency is not maintained. This usually results from the development and maintenance of systems.
Deference-based trust relates closely to concepts of justice and fairness. Justice can take several forms.
- Distributive justice is about the distribution of outcomes.
- Procedural justice is about the process of determining outcomes.
- Interactional justice is about how parties treat each other in one-to-one relationships.
- Systemic justice is about how organizations appear to treat groups of individuals and the norms that develop for how they should be treated.
Deference-based trust depends upon the repercussions when a fair or just process is not followed or a result is not reached.
A concept related to deterrence-based trust is reactance (or backfiring effect). This is a psychological principle stating that people often have a negative reaction when they perceive that their freedom is being limited or their behavior is being controlled; hence, they will engage in the opposite of the behaviors that surveillance is either attempting to ensure or control.
What is Knowledge-based Trust?
A type of trust grounded in behavioral predictability that occurs when a person has enough information about others to understand them and accurately predict their behavior.
As such, a person's reputation has an effect on trust in a relationship. Reputation is a perceptual identity, reflective of the combination of salient personal characteristics and accomplishments, demonstrated behavior, and intended images preserved over time, as observed directly and/or as reported from secondary sources.
Reputations are shaped by past behavior and influenced by an individuals personal characteristics and accomplishments. Reputation tends to be perceptual and highly subjective in nature. An individual can have a number of different, even conflicting, reputations because she may act quite differently in different situations.
Reputations develop over time; once developed, they are hard to change. Early experiences with another shape our views, which we bring to new situations in the form of expectations. These expectations are then confirmed or disconfirmed by the next set of experiences.
One's reputation can shape the emotional states and expectations of others.
What is an Identification-based Trust?
A type of trust that develops based on empathy for another person's desires, values, and intentions. This is closely related to knowledge-based trust, but it entails a level of personalization of interests. It often derives from a perceived commonality of goals.
Related Topics