Significance of Communication in Negotiation
If you still have questions or prefer to get help directly from an agent, please submit a request.
We’ll get back to you as soon as possible.
- Accounting, Taxation, and Reporting
Law, Transactions, & Risk Management
Government, Legal System, Administrative Law, & Constitutional Law Legal Disputes - Civil & Criminal Law Agency Law HR, Employment, Labor, & Discrimination Business Entities, Corporate Governance & Ownership Business Transactions, Antitrust, & Securities Law Real Estate, Personal, & Intellectual Property Commercial Law: Contract, Payments, Security Interests, & Bankruptcy Consumer Protection Insurance & Risk Management Immigration Law Environmental Protection Law Inheritance, Estates, and Trusts
- Marketing, Advertising, Sales & PR
- Business Management & Operations
- Economics, Finance, & Analytics
- Professionalism & Career Development
What is the significance of communication in a negotiation?
Negotiation is essentially an exercise in communication. The underlying objective is to use communication techniques to convince, persuade, or alter the perceptions of another.
The three most significant elements of communication include:
- verbal communications,
- non-verbal communications, and
- the medium of communication.
Next Article: What is communicated during a negotiation? Back to: NEGOTIATIONS
The effectiveness of verbal communication in a negotiation depends upon the ability of the speaker to encode thoughts properly and on the ability of the listener to understand and decode the intended message(s).
Language operates at two levels: the logical level (for proposals or offers) and the pragmatic level (semantics, syntax, and style). We often focus upon logical attributes instead of semantic or style attributes.
In any event, the meaning conveyed by a proposition or statement is a combination of one logical, surface message and several pragmatic messages.
A negotiator's word choice, tone, tempo, and inflections may not only signal a position but also shape and predict it.
Non-verbal communication is anything that is not words. Examples of non-verbal communication include: vocal cues or paralinguistic cues; facial expressions; eye contact; interpersonal spacing; posture; body movements; gestures; touching, etc.
Generally, successful communicators are nonverbally sensitive, nonverbally expressive, nonverbally self-controlled, and motivated to perform for their audiences.
It can be extremely important with regard to persuasion, power, and trust. People assert dominance and power through nonverbal cues. For example, high social power is reliably indicated by patterns of looking while speaking and listening.
A skilled negotiator will use non-verbal communication in a manner that furthers her strategy and strengthens her position.
A neutral exhibition of non-verbal communication is known as attending behaviors. Attending behavior lets the other know that you are listening and prepares her to receive your message.
Examples of attending behavior include making eye contact when speaking and adjusting one's body position to show engagement.
People negotiate through a variety of communication media: over the telephone, in writing, and increasingly through such electronic channels as e-mail and teleconferencing systems, instant messaging, and even text messaging.
It is important to recognize the context of the negotiation and select a communication channel that maximizes the potential for value creation and agreement.
Sometimes, however, there is little option to choose a channel. In such a case, it is important to be aware of the general hurdles that any communication channel entails.
For example, there is evidence that negotiation through written channels is more likely to end in an impasse than a negotiation that occurs face-to-face or by phone.
There is also evidence that e-mail negotiators reach agreements that are more equal than face-to-face negotiators.
Further, negotiators using e-mail need to work harder at building a personal rapport with the other party if they are to overcome the limitations of the channel that would otherwise inhibit optimal agreements or fuel impasse.