Federal Savings Loan Insurance Company - Definition
If you still have questions or prefer to get help directly from an agent, please submit a request.
We’ll get back to you as soon as possible.
- Accounting, Taxation, and Reporting
Law, Transactions, & Risk Management
Government, Legal System, Administrative Law, & Constitutional Law Legal Disputes - Civil & Criminal Law Agency Law HR, Employment, Labor, & Discrimination Business Entities, Corporate Governance & Ownership Business Transactions, Antitrust, & Securities Law Real Estate, Personal, & Intellectual Property Commercial Law: Contract, Payments, Security Interests, & Bankruptcy Consumer Protection Insurance & Risk Management Immigration Law Environmental Protection Law Inheritance, Estates, and Trusts
- Marketing, Advertising, Sales & PR
- Business Management & Operations
- Economics, Finance, & Analytics
- Professionalism & Career Development
Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation (FSLIC) What the pension benefit guarantycorporationcan learn from thefederal savingsandloan insurance corporation, Bodie, Z. (1996). Journal of Financial Services Research,10(1), 83-100. This article attempts to draw attention to some important lessons that the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (PBGC) can learn from the experience of the Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation (FSLIC). The cost of thesavingsandloancrisis: truth and consequences, Curry, T., & Shibut, L. (2000). FDIC Banking Rev.,13, 26. Symposium onFederalDepositInsurancefor S&L Institutions, Jaffee, D. M. (1989).Journal of Economic Perspectives,3(4), 3-9. This paper presents different questions related to the Federal deposit insurance which was introduced to eliminate the bank runs of the Great Depression in 1933. It analyses the problems solved by the Bush administration and Congress early in 1989 tin order to confront federal insurance of U.S. bank deposits. The reform offederaldepositinsurance, White, L. J. (1989). Journal of Economic Perspectives,3(4), 11-29. This paper analyses the crisis faced by deposit insurance in the early 1989 by the United States. It analyses the causes of this crisis, the related bodies, and the solution proffered to this crisis. This article will review the current system of deposit insurance and advocate a set of necessary reforms. On the risk of stocks in the long run, Bodie, Z. (1995). Financial Analysts Journal,51(3), 18-22. This paper analyses the proposition that investing in common stocks is less risky the longer an investor plans to hold them. It discusses different possibilities if this proposition were to be validd. This paper shows that the opposite is true, even if stock returns are mean reverting in the long run. This is done by analysing the reason for more younger investors than aged investors. The paper also shows that for guarantors of money-fixed annuities, the proposition that stocks in their portfolios are a better hedge the longer the maturity of their obligations is unambiguously wrong. The case against risk-related depositinsurancepremiums, Horvitz, P. M. (1983). Housing Fin. Rev.,2, 253. The high cost of incompletely funding theFSLICshortage of explicit capital, Kane, E. J. (1989). Journal of Economic Perspectives,3(4), 31-47. This paper draws a useful parallel between the Alaskan oil spill of 1989 and the flood of red ink spilled in recent years by U.S. thrift institutions (savings and loan associations and savings banks). It shows that in each case, initial damage from the spill was severely compounded by delaying and mishandling the clean-up required. The paper shows that the refusal on the part of the federal officials to acknowledge that the thrift ink spill had compromised the integrity of the supporting deposit-insurance fund imposed enormous costs on society as a whole. The 1985 Ohio thrift crisis, theFSLIC'ssolvency, and rate contagion for retail CDs, Cooperman, E. S., Lee, W. B., & Wolfe, G. A. (1992). The journal of Finance,47(3), 919-941. This paper uses both an ARIMA transferfunction intervention model and a panel data analysis to examine the effect of the Ohio deposit insurance crisis in 1985 on the pricing of sixmonth retail certificates of deposit (CDs) for federallyinsured Ohio banks and savings and loans. The authors find a significant, unanticipated rise in CDrate premiums on the initial event week of the crisis that continued for approximately seven weeks. Consistent with a contingent insurance guarantee hypothesis, rate premiums are found to be risk based. FSLICforbearances to stockholders and the value ofsavingsandloanshares, Thomson, J. B. (1987). Economic Review, (Q III), 26-35. An investigation of the value of FSLIC forbearances to the stockholders of insolvent stock-chartered thrift institutions, concluding that these forbearances increase the stock-market value of thrift institutions. On asset-liability matching andfederaldeposit and pensioninsurance, Bodie, Z. (2006).Review-Federal Reserve Bank of Saint Louis,88(4), 323. The first step in bank deregulation: What about the FDIC?, Kareken, J. H. (1983). The American Economic Review,73(2), 198-203.