Academic Research

• Digital signatures and global e-commerce: Part I-US initiatives, Stephens, D. O. (2001).Information Management,35(1), 68. This article discusses the execution of legal business transactions using digital signatures rather than physical or paper signatures as a milestone in the expansion of global E-commerce. The federal government has mandated that by October 2003 all agencies should convert their documents into electronic formats to facilitate the use of digital signatures. The use of electronic formats in contractual agreements helps to lower transaction costs and enhance productivity.
• TheE-Sign Actof 2000: the triumph of function over form in American Contract Law, Hays, M. J. (2000).Notre Dame L. Rev.,76, 1183. Congress believed that E-sign stands as a well-calculated approach to promote the development of e-commerce, hence they drafted a law that will certify the advancement of internet and electronic transactions. The laws provisions allow a proper balance to exist between function and form and provides a flexibility that allows changes and modifications of the law over time. This paper describes the entire process of how the Electronic Signature Act was passed by Congress.
• TheE-Sign Act: the means to effectively facilitate the growth and development of E-Commerce, Zemnick, S. R. (2000).Chi.-Kent L. Rev.,76, 1965. This paper explained that the development of commerce will occur in form digital transactions and electronic communications rather than paper transactions. The legal issues highlighted by the electronic society is solved by the E-sign act by permitting electronic formats to have the same legal effect, acceptability and enforceability as paper.
• The electronic signatures in global and national commerceact, Stern, J. E. (2001). Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 391-414. The technology-neutral nature of electronic signatures exempts them from being restricted to the use of a particular technology in making contracts. On the discovery of new technology, E-sign can be modified to work with it. However, this neutral nature may result in the use of outdated and insecure networks in making contracts promoting fraudulent activities. Legislators have proposed the use of Certification Authorities to shoulder the loss as a means of curbing fraudulent activities.
• Uniform Electronic Signatures in Global and National AcommerceAct: Removing Barriers to E-Commerce of Just Replacing Them with Privacy and Security Issues, Roland, S. E. (2001). Suffolk UL Rev.,35, 625. Electronic signatures have been a major block to the development of e-commerce. A bill was passed to solve the problems associated with E-signatures, the bill ensures that all electronic signatures have the same legal authority as paper signatures. The bill will promote e-commerce by giving clients the assurance that their transactions are safe.
• Electronic Records and Signatures under the FederalE-SIGNLegislation and the UETA, Wittie, R. A., & Winn, J. K. (2000).The Business Lawyer, 293-340. As electronic signatures eliminate old problems, it creates new ones. This paper explores problems associated with E-signs requirements, provisions and their relationship to those of the Uniform Electronic Transactions Act (UETA).
• Electronic Contracting in Delaware: TheE-Sign Actand the Uniform Electronic TransactionsAct, Denny, W. R. (2001).Del. L. Rev.,4, 33. With the explosive rise of e-commerce over the past decade, the need for the law to adapt to the use of E-sign as a means of transaction is quite necessary. This article will discuss the provisions of the state and federal legislation concerning Electronic Signatures in Global and National Commerce Act (E-sign) and the Uniform Electronic Transactions Act (UETA) which was adopted in Delaware on July 14, 2000.
• DoesE-SignPreempt the Illinois Electronic Commerce SecurityAct, Splinter, J. A. (2002). S. Ill. ULJ,27, 129. Illinois Electronic Commerce Security Act6 which was enacted on July 1, 1999, serves to promote the rise of e-commerce. After about a year, the Electronic Signatures in Global and National Commerce Act (E-sign) was enacted on the 30^th of June 2000.
• E-Sign Act: A Move in the Right Direction and a Boost for E-Commerce, The, Van Horn, D. W. (2001), The.Tenn. BJ,37, 14. A lot of business transactions are now carried out with the use of electronic signatures. This article highlights the positive effect electronic signatures have had on the rise of e-commerce over the past decade. It discusses the E-sign act and its provisions that increase the acceptability and legal authority.
• Clicks and bricks:: e-Risk Management for banks in the age of the Internet, Pennathur, A. K. (2001). Journal of banking & finance,25(11), 2103-2123. Due to the demands of clients for an online presence in the banking industry, banks now follow an online "clicks and bricks" strategy. This has multiplied the operational, legal, security and reputation risk faced by banks. A creative and foresighted approach, which is quite different from the traditional self-regulatory approach is necessary to tackle the risks.
• E-sign: Paperless Transactions in the new Millennium, Domanowski, S. (2001).DePaul L. Rev.,51, 619. The application of electronic transactions has led to core changes in contract law. These changes catapulted the present legal system into the future (new millennium). The only major requirement of the law is that both parties to the transaction mutually consent to the use of electronic signatures and records. With the legal changes adopted, electronic contracts have the same validity, enforceability, and acceptance as paper transactions.